Acknowledgements

Guide for Licence Fee Arrears in India: Acknowledgment of Debt (Sec 18, Limitation Act)

Are you struggling to recover unpaid licence fees in India and worried about the three-year limitation period expiring? A strategically obtained Acknowledgment of Debt is your most powerful legal instrument. Under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a valid acknowledgment can reset the legal clock, preserving your right to recover dues that would otherwise become a time-barred debt.

This comprehensive 2025 guide breaks down everything licensors and licensees need to know. We will explore the critical components of a valid acknowledgment, provide ready-to-use legal formats in English, Hindi, Tamil, and other regional languages, and analyze landmark case law. Furthermore, we’ll cover crucial practicalities like stamp duty requirements, corporate signatory authority, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring your claim remains legally enforceable. Acknowledgment of Right to Arrears of Licence Fees | Evaakil.com

Indian Corporate Law

A Guide to Acknowledgment of Debt for Licence Fee Arrears

Updated: October 14, 2025

Executive Summary

This guide provides a comprehensive legal and practical analysis of the 'Acknowledgment of Right to Arrears of Licence Fees' under Indian law. This document is a potent legal instrument for navigating the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Its primary purpose is to secure a formal admission of liability from a licensee *before* the statutory period to recover the debt expires, effectively resetting the limitation period and preserving the licensor's right to pursue legal action.

I. The Legal Imperative: Understanding Limitation in Indian Law

The need for an 'Acknowledgment of Right to Arrears' is rooted in a core principle of India's legal system: the law of limitation. Legal remedies aren't available forever and must be sought within a specific timeframe. For a licensor, failing to act can mean losing the right to recover unpaid fees.

Core Maxim:

"Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt" — the law assists the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.

The Limitation Clock Infographic

For most monetary claims, like licence fee arrears, the limitation period is three years from the date of default. After this, the claim becomes "time-barred."

3 YEARS To Sue

The Race Against Time

Once the three-year period elapses, the licensor's claim becomes time-barred. The right to the money still exists, but the legal *remedy* (the ability to sue) is lost. An acknowledgment of debt is the key to resetting this clock.

II. The Anatomy of a Valid Acknowledgment (Section 18)

The legal power of an acknowledgment comes from Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. To be valid and reset the limitation period, it must satisfy four essential conditions. The acknowledgment need not be a formal document; it can be inferred from balance sheets, letters, or even emails, as long as it unequivocally admits a subsisting jural relationship of debtor and creditor.

1. In Writing

Oral admissions are not enough. It must be a written document, email, or even an entry in a balance sheet.

2. Signed by Liable Party

Must be signed by the licensee or a duly authorized agent. Authority is key for corporate entities.

3. Made Before Expiry

This is a strict requirement. The acknowledgment must be signed *before* the original 3-year period ends.

4. Admits Liability

The document must clearly admit a "present subsisting liability." It doesn't need to state the exact amount or promise to pay.

Interactive Chart: The Effect of Acknowledgment

A valid acknowledgment gives the licensor a fresh period of limitation, starting from the date the document is signed.

III. Judicial Lens: Landmark Case Law

The interpretation of Section 18 has been shaped by numerous Supreme Court and High Court judgments. These cases provide crucial clarity on what constitutes a valid acknowledgment.

Food Corporation of India v. Assam State Cooperative Marketing & Consumer Federation Ltd. (2004)

"An acknowledgment must be a conscious admission of liability. A mere statement of fact which is not intended to be an admission will not operate as an acknowledgment."

Key Takeaway: Intent matters. The document must clearly show the debtor's intention to admit the debt.

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. v. Bishal Jaiswal (2021)

"An entry made in the company's balance sheet can amount to an acknowledgment of liability within the meaning of Section 18 of the Limitation Act."

Key Takeaway: Corporate financial statements can serve as legally valid acknowledgments, a critical point in commercial disputes.

V. The Corporate Signatory: Who Can Bind a Company?

When dealing with a company, it's not enough to get a signature; you must get the *right* signature. An acknowledgment is invalid if signed by an individual without the authority to bind the company to financial liabilities.

  • Generally Authorized:

    Managing Directors, Whole-Time Directors, or any person explicitly authorized by a Board Resolution.

  • Potentially Authorized (Verify):

    Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or Company Secretary, depending on their defined powers within the company's articles.

  • Generally Not Authorized:

    Managers, Accountants, or other employees without specific authorization for such matters.

Pro Tip:

When receiving an acknowledgment from a company, always request a copy of the supporting Board Resolution or an extract of the Articles of Association that grants signing authority to the individual.

VI. The Stamp Duty Imperative: Ensuring Admissibility

An acknowledgment of debt is an "instrument" under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Failure to pay the requisite stamp duty has severe consequences: the document becomes inadmissible as evidence in a court of law.

Consequences of Non-Stamping

An unstamped or inadequately stamped acknowledgment cannot be presented in court to prove the debt. While the underlying debt doesn't vanish, your most crucial piece of evidence to reset limitation is nullified.

State-Specific Duty

Stamp duty is a state subject in India. The amount payable varies from state to state. It is crucial to check the applicable State Stamp Act to ensure compliance. The duty is typically nominal for a simple acknowledgment.

VII. Common Pitfalls & Mistakes to Avoid

While a powerful tool, errors in drafting or execution can render an acknowledgment useless. Here are common mistakes to watch out for.

  • Ambiguous Language: Using conditional phrases like "we may owe" or "subject to our verification" negates the admission of liability. The acknowledgment must be clear and unequivocal.
  • "Without Prejudice" Clause: Never accept an acknowledgment marked "without prejudice." This phrase typically makes the document inadmissible as evidence of an admission.
  • Missing the Deadline: As stressed before, getting the acknowledgment signed even one day after the limitation period expires makes it invalid under Section 18.
  • Partial Acknowledgment: If a licensee acknowledges only part of the debt, it resets the limitation period only for that specific part, not the entire outstanding amount.

VIII. Strategic Perspectives

Filter the key insights based on your role or interest.

Preserve Your Remedy

The primary use is to prevent a claim from becoming time-barred, allowing you to negotiate without losing your right to sue.

Strengthen Legal Claims

A signed acknowledgment is powerful evidence in court, simplifying recovery suits and potentially leading to a summary judgment.

Beware of Informal Admissions

Be cautious in communications. Even an email or a balance sheet entry can be construed as a legal acknowledgment, resetting the clock against you.

Authority to Sign is Critical

An acknowledgment signed by an unauthorized employee is legally worthless. Licensors must verify the signatory's authority.

Catalyst for Negotiation

The request for an acknowledgment often formalizes the debt discussion, creating a clear basis for negotiating a payment plan.

Stamp Duty is Mandatory

An unstamped acknowledgment is inadmissible in court. Ensure compliance with state stamp duty laws to maintain its validity as evidence.

IX. Advanced Considerations: Acknowledgment vs. Promise to Pay

It's vital to distinguish an acknowledgment under the Limitation Act from a promise to pay a time-barred debt under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. They are different tools for different situations.

Feature Acknowledgment (Limitation Act, S.18) Promise to Pay (Contract Act, S.25(3))
Status of Debt Subsisting (within limitation period) Time-Barred (limitation expired)
Nature of Statement Simple admission of liability Express and unconditional promise to pay
Legal Effect Resets the limitation clock Creates a new, valid contract
Timing Must be signed *before* expiry Signed *after* expiry

X. Strategic Recommendations for Licensors

Effective debt recovery requires a proactive and systematic workflow. An acknowledgment should be an integral part of this process.

The Debt Recovery Escalation Path

1

Informal Reminders

Start with professional reminders via email and phone calls as soon as payment is missed (0-60 days).

2

Formal Request for Acknowledgment

If unpaid after 90 days or as the limitation deadline nears, send a formal request with a pre-drafted form. Position it as a standard procedure.

3

Legal Notice

If the acknowledgment is refused, engage a lawyer to issue a formal Legal Notice. This signals serious intent.

4

Initiation of Legal Proceedings

If the notice fails, file a civil suit. The prior documented steps will significantly strengthen your case.

Recovery Stages Breakdown

Typical distribution of recovery outcomes by stage.

XI. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can an email exchange be considered a valid acknowledgment?

Yes, provided it meets all the conditions of Section 18. An email from an authorized person that clearly admits the debt before the limitation period expires can be a valid acknowledgment. However, proving the authenticity and authority of the sender is key.

What if the acknowledgment does not specify the exact amount owed?

It is still valid. Section 18 does not require the exact amount to be stated. As long as the acknowledgment admits liability for a debt, oral evidence can be presented later to prove the exact amount. The primary purpose is to acknowledge the jural relationship of debtor-creditor.

I have an unstamped acknowledgment. Can I fix it?

Yes, in many cases. The law allows for the "impounding" of an unstamped instrument. You can present it to the Collector of Stamps, pay the deficient stamp duty along with a penalty (which can be up to ten times the deficient amount), and have the document certified. After this process, it becomes admissible in court.

Does a part-payment of the debt also extend the limitation period?

Yes. Under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a part-payment made towards a debt by the debtor or their authorized agent before the limitation period expires will also start a fresh period of limitation from the date of payment. The payment must be acknowledged in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making the payment.

Evaakil.com

Your trusted partner in legal clarity.

© 2025 Evaakil.com. All Rights Reserved. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

What is your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0 %