Agreements

Carriage of Goods Agreement Audit: Liability Caps, GST Compliance & ODC Traps

Many manufacturers still operate on logistics contracts drafted before the GST rollout or the 2018 axle load revisions. These “zombie agreements” often reference dead statutes like the Companies Act, 1956 or demand obsolete permits like Octroi, creating a legal deadlock during transit. More dangerously, they offer a false sense of security regarding cargo liability.

While a contract may state the transporter is “wholly liable” for damage, Indian courts strictly enforce the statutory cap under the Carriage by Road Act, 2007—often leaving shippers absorbing the majority of the loss.

This audit dissects those specific failures, calculates the hidden costs of outdated dimension clauses, and provides a corrected 2025 framework to secure your supply chain against uninsured losses.

Evaakil.com | Legal Audit: Carriage of Goods Agreement 2025
Contract Audit

The Zombie Contract. Why Your 2018 Logistics Agreement is a Legal Liability.

We audited a standard “Agreement for Carriage of Goods” used by manufacturers. The result? It relies on dead taxes, repealed laws, and exposes companies to massive uninsured losses. Here is how to fix it for 2025.

By Legal Audit Team | Updated December 2025

Risk Exposure Analysis

Visualizing the gap between the submitted contract and 2025 statutory requirements.

Current Contract
Statutory Limit
Ideal State

The Statutory Vacuum

The reviewed agreement anchors itself to the Companies Act, 1956. While companies incorporated under the 1956 Act still exist, governing a commercial relationship in 2025 using a repealed statute is dangerous. It muddles definitions of “Control” and “Subsidiary” which are crucial for assignment clauses.

More critically, the agreement calls the transporter a “Contractor” but ignores their statutory status as a Common Carrier under the Carriage by Road Act, 2007. This is not just semantics. Common Carriers have specific registration numbers (CCRN) that must be cited to validate insurance claims.

The Fix

Replace all references to the “Companies Act 1956” with “Companies Act, 2013”. Mandate the inclusion of the transporter’s Common Carrier Registration Number in the Preamble.

The Width Trap: Clause 26

Clause 26 is a financial landmine. It defines any load exceeding 7 feet (2.13 meters) in width as “Over-Dimensional Cargo” (ODC). However, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR), Rule 93, allows a standard truck width of 2.6 meters (approx. 8.5 feet).

By artificially lowering the “normal” limit, the transporter can charge you premium ODC rates for loads that are actually legally standard.

Contract vs. Legal Width Comparison

Contract “Normal” (7 ft) ODC Charge Triggered Here
2.13 Meters
Legal Standard (CMVR Rule 93) Standard Rates Apply
2.60 Meters

The 25% “Phantom Freight” Tax

The contract is from 2018. In August 2018, MoRTH Notification No. S.O. 3467(E) increased “Safe Axle Weights” across India. If your contract still uses pre-2018 weight limits (e.g., 9T for a 6-wheeler), you are paying for full trucks but shipping partial loads.

Disclaimer: This calculator uses GVW limits per MoRTH S.O. 3467(E). Actual payload capacity depends on vehicle tare weight and RTO registration. This is an estimation tool, not legal advice.

Old Payload Limit 9.0 Tons
New Payload Limit 12.0 Tons
Unused Capacity Per Trip 3.0 Tons
Annual “Phantom Freight” Loss ₹ 625,000

Money wasted paying for trucks that aren’t fully loaded to legal capacity.

The Ghost of Taxes Past

Clause 6 demands an “Octroi Exemption Certificate” and a “Bihar Sales Tax Permit.” Both are legally extinct. Octroi was abolished with GST (2017). Bihar permits were replaced by E-Way Bills.

Feature
Old Contract Clause
2025 Legal Reality
Local Entry Tax
“Octroi Exemption Certificate”
Abolished. Subsumed by GST.
Road Permits
“Bihar Sales Tax Permit”
E-Way Bill (Section 68 CGST Act).
Penalty Risk
Undefined
200% of Tax Payable (Sec 129 CGST).

GST Compliance: The 5% vs 12% Dilemma

The contract is silent on GST status. This is critical because Goods Transport Agencies (GTA) offer two tax regimes. If the contract doesn’t specify, the default liability for paying tax falls on YOU (The Service Recipient) under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).

Option A: Forward Charge (FCM)

12% GST

Charged by Transporter on Invoice.

  • Transporter claims Input Tax Credit (ITC).
  • You simply pay the invoice.
  • Action: Require a Declaration Annexure.

Option B: Reverse Charge (RCM)

5% GST

Paid directly by You to Govt.

  • Transporter charges 0% on invoice.
  • You must self-invoice and pay Govt.
  • Risk: Forgot to pay? 18% Interest penalty.

The Liability Illusion

The contract says the contractor is “wholly liable” for any loss. The law disagrees. Under Section 10 of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007, liability is capped at 10 times the freight amount unless a higher risk rate is paid.

Liability Gap Calculator

Contract Promise (Indemnity)
₹ 5,000,000
Actual Legal Limit (10x Freight)
₹ 400,000
Uninsured Loss
₹ 4,600,000

Disclaimer: This calculation is based on Rule 12 of the Carriage by Road Rules, 2011. Courts may interpret liability differently based on negligence proof. This tool does not substitute professional legal advice.

The Subrogation Firewall

Even if you have Marine Insurance, your claim can be rejected if your contract accidentally waives the Insurer’s right to sue the carrier (Subrogation).

1

The Incident

Truck overturns. Goods worth ₹10L damaged.

2

The Claim

You claim ₹10L from your Insurance Company.

3

The Rejection

Insurer checks your Contract. Sees “Liability limited to freight” or missing “Subrogation Letter”. Claim Denied.

Fix: Add a clause requiring the Transporter to issue a “Damage Certificate” (COF) within 7 days of any incident, explicitly admitting the accident occurred under their custody.

Clause 25: The Detention Cash Leak

Clause 25 mandates “Stay Charges” if a vehicle waits more than 6 working hours. The industry standard is 24 hours. This aggressive clause drains cash for minor warehouse delays.

💸

Cost Simulator

See how much extra you pay per truck compared to market standards.

Extra Cost vs Market ₹ 1,500
Disclaimer: Calculations assume a standard 24-hour detention free period vs. the 6-hour period in Clause 25. Actual costs vary by transporter rates.

Operational Compliance

The “Goods Receipt”

The contract asks for a signed “Challan.” This is insufficient for insurance. You must demand a Goods Receipt (Form 8).

  • Contains GSTIN of both parties
  • Declares Owner’s vs Carrier’s Risk
  • Prima facie evidence in court

The “Blank” Jurisdiction

Clause 27 is left blank. If a dispute arises, the carrier can sue you in their remote home jurisdiction.

  • Risk of litigation in remote courts.
  • Fix: “Exclusive Jurisdiction of [Your City] Courts.”
  • Use Digital Notices (Email/WhatsApp) in contracts.
Free Resource

Modernized Agreement Template (2025)

Based on your uploaded document, but corrected for legal compliance.

Full Template Copied to Clipboard!

AGREEMENT FOR CARRIAGE OF GOODS

THIS AGREEMENT is made on this [Day] day of [Month], 2025

BETWEEN

[YOUR COMPANY NAME], a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, having its registered office at [Address] (hereinafter referred to as the “EMPLOYER”) of the One Part;

AND

[TRANSPORTER NAME], a company/firm registered as a Common Carrier under the Carriage by Road Act, 2007 (CCRN No: [Insert Number]), having its registered office at [Address] (hereinafter referred to as the “CONTRACTOR”) of the Other Part.

WHEREAS:

A. The Employer manufactures and deals in structural engineering and mechanical equipment.

B. The Contractor is a Logistics Service Provider owning/operating a fleet of vehicles and represents that it holds valid Permits and Licenses to transport goods across India.

NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS:

1. TERM: This agreement shall be valid for a period of One Year starting from [Start Date] to [End Date], unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms herein.

2. SECURITY DEPOSIT: The Contractor shall deposit an interest-free Security Deposit of Rs. [Amount], which shall be refundable upon successful completion of the contract, subject to deductions for any loss/damage caused to the Employer.

3. COMPLIANCE & GST:
a) The Contractor shall comply with the GST Act, 2017. The Contractor exercises the option to pay GST under [Forward Charge @ 12% / Reverse Charge @ 5%].
b) The Contractor shall ensure valid E-Way Bills are generated and updated (Part B) for all consignments. Any penalty under Section 129 of the CGST Act due to expiry or error in the E-Way Bill shall be borne solely by the Contractor.

4. PLACEMENT OF VEHICLES: The Contractor guarantees to supply vehicles as per the Employer’s requisition within [24] hours of notice. Failure to place vehicles may result in the Employer hiring from the open market, with the cost difference debited to the Contractor.

5. LIABILITY & INSURANCE:
a) The Freight Rates agreed herein are inclusive of the ‘Higher Risk Rate’ as envisaged under Section 11 of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007.
b) The Contractor accepts liability for the full declared value of the consignment in the event of loss, damage, or theft, notwithstanding the limits prescribed under Section 10 of the said Act.
c) The Contractor shall issue a Certificate of Facts (COF) within 7 days of any accident to facilitate Insurance Claims.

6. DETENTION CHARGES: Detention charges shall only be payable if the vehicle is detained at the loading/unloading point for more than 24 hours. The rate of detention shall be Rs. [Amount] per day.

7. OVER-DIMENSIONAL CARGO (ODC): Standard Vehicle dimensions shall be as per CMVR Rule 93 (2.6m Width). Any cargo within these limits shall not attract ODC charges.

8. PAYMENT TERMS: Bills shall be submitted in triplicate with the proof of delivery (POD). Payment shall be made within [30/45] days of submission. (Note: Ensure compliance with MSME Act if Contractor is registered).

9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION & JURISDICTION:
All disputes arising out of this agreement shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts at [YOUR CITY]. Digital notices sent via email to registered addresses shall be considered valid.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this agreement on the date first above written.


_________________________
For EMPLOYER
_________________________
For CONTRACTOR

Specific Clause Replacements

To replace “Bihar Permit” clauses:

“The Contractor shall ensure strict compliance with E-Way Bill provisions under Section 68 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Contractor assumes sole responsibility for updating Part B of the E-Way Bill and extending its validity in case of transit delays. The Contractor indemnifies the Employer against any detention penalties (Section 129) or tax demands arising from E-Way Bill expiration or discrepancies.”
Copied to clipboard!

Frequently Asked Questions

Clause 1 mentions the contract is valid until “31st November”. Since November only has 30 days, this creates ambiguity about the actual expiry date. In a dispute regarding a shipment on Dec 1st, the carrier could argue the contract was void ab initio due to an impossible date, or that it expired on Nov 30th.
While the company remains legal, the 1956 Act was repealed. Using it makes definitions like “Subsidiary” or “Associate Company” ambiguous. Modern contracts must reference the Companies Act, 2013 to ensure corporate governance terms are enforceable.
No. Courts strictly enforce the statutory cap (10x Freight) unless you explicitly agree to a “Higher Risk Rate” under Section 11. General indemnity clauses are often read down by courts in favor of the specific statutory limit.
The contract defines “normal” width as 7 feet. The law (CMVR) allows up to 2.6 meters (approx 8.5 feet). If you accept the contract’s definition, you might pay extra “ODC charges” for loads that are actually standard size under the law.

Evaakil.com

Providing actionable legal intelligence for modern logistics. This audit does not constitute legal advice.

© 2025 Evaakil.com. All rights reserved.

What is your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
0 %