Engaging contract labour in India carries specific statutory risks that often catch Principal Employers off guard. With the transition from the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 to the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code (OSH Code), the legal framework governing manpower supply has shifted.
A poorly drafted agreement—specifically one relying on legacy “commission” or “cost-plus” models—can trigger “Sham Contract” litigation, forcing the absorption of contract workers as permanent employees.
This analysis breaks down the necessary clauses for a valid “Contract for Service,” outlines the financial safeguards required under the Code on Wages, and provides executable templates to secure your compliance posture against Section 21 liabilities and BOCW Act mandates.
The New Rules of Labour Supply.
How the 2025 Labour Codes reshape the agreement between Owners and Contractors.
The engagement of contract labour in India is no longer a simple commercial handshake. It is a regulated tripartite arrangement that imposes significant liabilities on the Principal Employer. As of 2025-2026, the transition from the legacy Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 to the consolidated framework of the four Labour Codes has fundamentally altered compliance obligations.
This guide provides a legal analysis of the “Agreement for Supply of Labour” and dissects the distinction between “Contract for Service” and “Contract of Service.” It also examines the impact of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code (OSH Code) and the Code on Wages.
The “Sham” Doctrine
Indian courts have consistently pierced the corporate veil to ascertain the true nature of the relationship between the Principal Employer and the contract worker. The essence of a valid labour supply agreement is that it establishes a genuine contract between the Principal Employer and the Contractor.
If the contract is found to be a camouflage to avoid statutory benefits due to regular employees, the court will disregard the agreement. The contract workers will be treated as direct employees of the Principal Employer. This is the “Sham Contract” doctrine, reiterated in SAIL vs. National Union Waterfront Workers.
Visualizing the Tripartite Relationship
Figure 1: The correct legal flow of Control and Payment.
Service vs. Employment
The distinction is legally decisive. A “Contract of Service” creates an employer-employee relationship. A “Contract for Service” creates a principal-independent contractor relationship.
Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Contract OF Service (Employment) | Contract FOR Service (Independent) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Employer controls manner of work. | Contractor decides manner. |
| Tools & Equipment | Provided by Employer. | Provided by Contractor. |
| Economic Risk | Borne by Employer. | Borne by Contractor (Profit/Loss). |
| Disciplinary Power | Employer can hire/fire. | Only Contractor can discipline. |
The “Cost-Plus” Trap: Analyzing Legacy Agreements
Many traditional agreements, like the standard templates often circulated (referencing Clause 3 of your provided document), utilize a “Commission on Disbursement” model. This structure is fraught with legal peril in the post-2025 landscape.
Legacy Model (High Risk)
“The Contractor is entitled to 10% commission on total wages disbursed.”
- Interpretation: Courts view this as the Principal Employer paying the wages directly, with the Contractor acting merely as a “paymaster” or agent.
- Consequence: It supports the argument for a “Direct Employer-Employee” relationship, leading to absorption claims.
- Fiscal: GST authorities may demand tax on the entire wage bill, not just the service charge.
Unit-Rate Model (Recommended)
“The Contractor shall be paid ₹500 per sq. ft. of wall constructed / ₹25,000 per man-month output.”
- Interpretation: This is a genuine “Contract for Service.” The Contractor bears the risk of efficiency.
- Consequence: Breaks the nexus between the Principal Employer’s money and the worker’s wage.
- Fiscal: Clearer demarcation for Input Tax Credit (ITC).
The “Prevailing Market Rate” Fallacy
Clause 2 of your document states: “The labour shall be paid at the prevailing market rate.” In modern legal drafting, this phrasing is ambiguous and dangerous.
Why “Market Rate” fails:
- Below Minimum Wage: If the market rate is lower than the statutory minimum wage notification, the contract is void ab initio and the Principal Employer is liable for the differential amount + penalty.
- Variable Standard: “Prevailing rate” fluctuates. It gives the Contractor a loophole to demand hikes mid-contract.
- The Correct Standard: “Wages shall be paid in accordance with the Minimum Wages Act (or Code on Wages) notifications issued by the State Government, plus applicable statutory contributions (PF/ESIC).”
Transition to Labour Codes (2025)
The OSH Code subsumes and repeals the CLRA. It introduces significant structural changes.
Single License Regime
Contractors operating in multiple states can now obtain a single All-India license valid for five years. This replaces the requirement of obtaining separate licenses for each work order.
Core Activity Ban
Section 57 prohibits contract labour in “core activities” unless specific exceptions apply. The “Scope of Work” clause must be drafted to align with these exceptions.
The 50% Wage Rule
Under the Code on Wages, allowances (HRA, Overtime) cannot exceed 50% of the total remuneration. Any excess is deemed “Wages” for social security calculation. Agreements must be modeled on this new definition to avoid short-payment liabilities.
Wage Structure Composition
Figure 2: Permissible allowance splits under Code on Wages, 2019.
The Compliance Shield
To insulate the Principal Employer from Section 14 (CLRA/OSH) liabilities, a rigorous document collection process is required monthly.
Day 1-7: Wage Disbursement
Contractor must pay wages directly to worker bank accounts. Cash payments are high-risk.
Day 15: Statutory Deposits
Contractor deposits EPF (PF Challan) and ESIC contributions.
Day 20: Invoice Submission
Contractor submits invoice to Principal Employer with “Proof of Compliance”.
Monthly Document Checklist
Risk Transfer & Financial Safeguards
Clause 4 of standard agreements often places liability on the Contractor, but statutory law places the ultimate burden on the Principal Employer. Two mechanisms are vital to manage this risk: Statutory Recovery and Insurance coverage.
The “Right to Recover” (Sec 21 CLRA)
The Principal Employer’s most powerful tool is Section 21(4) of the CLRA (mirrored in the OSH Code). If a Contractor fails to pay wages, the Principal Employer must pay the workers directly. However, the law explicitly allows the Principal Employer to recover this amount from the Contractor’s bills or Security Deposit.
Drafting Tip: The Indemnity Clause must explicitly reference this statutory right to deduct dues from the “current or future bills.”
Insurance Decision Logic
Figure 3: Determining the correct policy coverage.
Workmen’s Compensation (WC) Policy
If your site is outside an ESIC notified area, or if workers earn above ₹21,000/month, a WC Policy is mandatory under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923. The Principal Employer is liable for accidents on site if this policy is absent.
Construction Specifics: The BOCW Act
Since the reference document mentions “masons” and “construction”, the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 applies. This imposes distinct liabilities separate from general labour laws.
The 1% Cess Liability
The Principal Employer (Owner) is primarily liable to pay 1% Cess on the total cost of construction to the Welfare Board.
Risk: If you pay the Contractor the full amount inclusive of Cess, and they fail to deposit it, the Government will recover it from you (the Owner) with interest.
Action: Deduct 1% from every running bill and deposit it directly to the BOCW Board.
Safety Officer Requirement
If engaging 500 or more building workers, a Safety Officer is mandatory. For smaller numbers, specific safety committees are required. The contract must mandate that the Contractor provides PPE (helmets, harnesses) conforming to BIS standards.
Data Privacy (DPDP Act 2023)
Collecting Aadhaar cards and bank details of contract workers makes the Principal Employer a “Data Fiduciary” (or joint fiduciary) under the new Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
Mandatory Clauses for the Agreement
- Consent Collection: The Contractor must warrant that they have obtained “verifiable consent” from workers to share their personal data with the Principal Employer for compliance purposes.
- Purpose Limitation: Data collected (e.g., for Gate Passes or PF verification) must not be used for any other analytics or shared with third parties.
- Data Erasure: Upon termination of the contract, the Principal Employer must delete worker data unless retention is required by law (e.g., maintaining wage registers for 3 years).
Drafting the Agreement
The agreement serves as the first line of defense. It must contain specific representations that the Contractor is an independent legal entity.
Clause: Scope of Services
Focus on output and service levels rather than manpower numbers to pass the control test.
Clause: Reimbursement & Statutory Check
Ensures verification of statutory payments before releasing funds.
Clause: Broad Indemnity & Recovery
Protects against vicarious liability and enables recovery.
Clause: No-Fault Termination
Clear exit path without retrenchment liabilities.
Clause: Arbitration
Avoids lengthy court battles.
Complete Agreement Templates
Below are two versions of the agreement. The first is the reference format (as per your upload), and the second is a modern, compliance-oriented structure.
Standard Reference (Legacy)
Caution: This format uses “Commission” and “Market Rate” clauses which may create liability under the 2025 Labour Codes. Use for reference only.
Modern Compliance Format
Recommended: Aligns with OSH Code, Wage Code, and BOCW Act. Focuses on “Contract for Service” and Output.
Performance Management: From Damages to SLAs
Legacy contracts (referencing Clause 5 of your document) often use “Liquidated Damages” (e.g., fixed ₹500 fine per missing worker). This is outdated. Modern agreements utilize Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that link payment to output quality, not just headcount.
| Metric | Legacy “Fine” Approach | Modern SLA Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Absenteeism | Fixed ₹500 deduction per day. | Cost of replacement + 15% Admin Fee + SLA Score reduction. |
| Misconduct | Request to replace worker. | Immediate removal + Penalty of 5% of monthly bill for safety violations. |
| Statutory Default | Indemnity clause only. | Stop Payment: 100% hold on invoice until proof of PF/ESIC deposit is shown. |
Termination & Exit Strategy
Ending a labour supply contract is often more dangerous than starting one. If the Contractor’s workers have been at your site for years (e.g., security guards or canteen staff), they may claim “automatic absorption” upon contract termination.
The Golden Rules of Exit
- Rotation: Do not keep the same Contractor (and consequently the same set of workers) for indefinite periods. Rotate contractors every 2-3 years.
- Full & Final Settlement: Ensure the Contractor provides proof of Full & Final (F&F) settlement with their workers, including Gratuity payments, before releasing their final Security Deposit.
- No Direct Negotiation: Never negotiate severance directly with the contract workers. Always channel communication through the Contractor.
Beyond the Contract: The POSH Mandate
Under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, a “Contract Worker” is explicitly covered under the definition of an “Employee”.
Principal Employer’s Duty
If a contract worker faces harassment on your premises, your Internal Committee (IC) must accept the complaint if the Contractor does not have their own IC. You must ensure the Contractor’s staff are sensitized.
Drafting Requirement
Include a clause: “The Contractor warrants that it has constituted an Internal Committee (IC) under the POSH Act and shall strictly comply with all provisions regarding the safety of women employees.”
Fiscal Dimensions
Stamp Duty
If the agreement is purely for manpower supply, it falls under Article 5(c) (Agreement). If it involves transfer of property in goods, it becomes a “Works Contract” attracting higher ad-valorem duty.
Tip: Explicitly state “This Agreement is for the provision of services only” to minimize duty.
GST & ITC
Manpower Supply (SAC 9985) is taxable at 18%. The Principal Employer can claim Input Tax Credit (ITC).
Tip: Include a clause allowing withholding of GST components if the Contractor fails to upload invoices to the GST portal (GSTR-1).
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I employ contract labour for core activities?
Generally, no. Section 57 of the OSH Code prohibits it. However, exceptions exist if the activity is ordinarily done through a contractor, does not require full-time workers, or meets a sudden surge in volume.
Who is responsible for safety amenities?
Under the OSH Code, the Principal Employer is primarily responsible for providing welfare facilities like canteens and restrooms, while the Contractor remains responsible for wages.
What is the risk of a “Sham” contract?
If the court finds the contract is a sham, the contract workers are treated as direct employees of the Principal Employer, entitling them to regularization, back wages, and all standard employee benefits.








