Affidavits

Order 39 Rule 1 CPC: Ad-Interim Injunction Law, Affidavit Formats, and Judicial Standards

Civil litigation in India often requires immediate protection for disputed property. Order 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 provides the statutory framework for temporary and ad-interim injunctions. These orders prevent the waste, damage, or alienation of suit property before the court reaches a final decision. Successful applications rely on three specific tests: a prima facie case, irreparable injury, and the balance of convenience.

Recent judicial shifts place a heavy burden on the quality of the supporting affidavit. Failure to disclose material facts or follow mandatory service rules under Rule 3 leads to the immediate vacation of ex-parte stays. This guide describes the drafting of injunction affidavits, statutory bars under the Specific Relief Act, and the consequences of disobedience. Legal professionals can use the provided templates to maintain compliance with current High Court rules and Original Side requirements.

Master Guide: Ad-Interim Injunctions & Affidavit Standards | Evaakil.com
Master Legal Compendium

Ad-Interim Injunctions & Affidavit Standards.

A definitive analysis of Order XXXIX of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, integrating 2026 procedural standards, commercial disclosure requirements, and specialized judicial orders.

Editorial Board | Updated January 31, 2026

The Judicial Triple Test

Weightage of Interlocutory Factors

This visualization represents the proportional focus of the court during a contested hearing. While a prima facie case is the threshold, the balance of convenience often dictates the final discretionary choice.

Legal Research Modules

Order XIX

The Affidavit Foundation

Affidavits for injunctions allow for statements based on belief. However, under the 2026 standards, courts now strictly enforce the separation of “Knowledge” and “Belief.”

  • Source of belief must be disclosed
  • Verification must be specific to paragraphs
  • False statements trigger Sec. 340 CrPC
Section 80

Suits Against the Government

Normally requires a 60-day notice. To obtain an urgent injunction, the Plaintiff must file a separate application seeking leave of the court to waive the notice period under Section 80(2).

“The court shall not grant relief without giving the Government a reasonable opportunity of showing cause.”

Jurisprudence

Landmark Citations

Shiv Kumar Chadha v. MCD (1993)

Reasons for ex-parte injunctions are a mandatory jurisdictional requirement.

Morgan Stanley v. Kartick Das (1994)

Defined ex-parte standards for commercial and securities litigation.

Section 151

Inherent Judicial Powers

Used to bridge gaps in the CPC. However, Section 151 cannot be invoked if there is an express prohibition under Order 39. It serves as a tool for equity when the statute is silent.

Specialized Injunction Framework

Digital Law

John Doe Orders

Commonly known as ‘Ashok Kumar’ orders. These protect intellectual property against unknown infringers, allowing the plaintiff to stop mass piracy or trademark violations by unidentified parties.

Real Estate

Rule 7 Inspections

Allows the court to appoint a Local Commissioner for the detention, preservation, or inspection of any property forming the subject matter of the dispute.

Infrastructure

Section 20A Bar

Statutory prohibition under the Specific Relief Act prevents courts from staying infrastructure projects if it causes a delay in completion.

Jurisdiction & Appeals

Original Side Variations

High Courts in Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras have specific internal rules for interlocutory applications. These often require a “Caveat Search” before moving an ex-parte application.

Verification via digital signatures is now mandatory in 2026 for all Original Side filings.

The Remedy of Appeal

Orders under Rule 1, 2, 4, or 10 are appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r). This is a statutory right, distinct from a Revision.

  • » Limited interference by appellate courts
  • » Focus on “Perversity” or “Legal Error”
  • » Right to apply for variation under Rule 4

Statutory Deep Dive

Mandatory Injunctions

To compel a positive act, the court applies the “Dorab Cawasji” test. This requires a standard of proof significantly higher than the standard “Prima Facie” case.

Standard: Compelling necessity to prevent grave injury and restoration of the status quo.

Commercial Disclosure (Order XI)

Under the Commercial Courts Act, seeking an injunction requires a “Statement of Truth.” Parties must disclose every document in their possession related to the suit.

Suppression leads to immediate vacation of stay.

Doctrine of Restitution (Sec. 144)

Courts have the inherent power to undo the benefits of a wrongful injunction. This includes restitution of property, profits, and interest for the period of the stay.

The Equity Standard

Injunction is an equitable relief. A plaintiff who conceal previous litigation or fails to disclose a prior refusal of stay will face exemplary costs under Section 35A.

Rule 2A: Disobedience & Breach

Willful breach of an injunction order triggers quasi-criminal proceedings.

Sanction I

Civil Imprisonment

Detention in a civil prison for a term not exceeding three months. Requires strict proof of willful intent.

Sanction II

Attachment of Property

Property may be attached for one year. If the breach continues, the property may be sold to compensate the aggrieved party.

Post-Order Compliance Flow (Rule 3)

1

Recording Reasons

The Court must record specific reasons why delay would defeat the object of the injunction.

2

Immediate Service

Serve the Defendant with the Plaint, Application, Affidavit, and Order via speed post/email on the same day.

3

Filing Affidavit

File a Compliance Affidavit in Court on the day of service or the next working day without fail.

Comparative Order Analysis

Order Classification Trigger Rule Hearing Standard Validity Limit
Ad-Interim Urgent relief; Rule 3 Ex-parte (One side) Until next hearing date
Temporary Injunction Rule 1 and Rule 2 Bi-parte (Both heard) Until final disposal
Status Quo Inherent Powers Preservation of state Discretionary duration

Master Templates

1. Affidavit for Ad-Interim Injunction (Consolidated)

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, AT [CITY NAME] Civil Suit No. ________ of 2026 [PLAINTIFF NAME] … Plaintiff VERSUS [DEFENDANT NAME] … Defendant AFFIDAVIT I, [Name], son of [Father’s Name], aged [Age] years, residing at [Address], do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows: 1. I am the Plaintiff in the above-mentioned suit and I am well conversant with the facts of the case. 2. The present suit is filed for [Nature of Relief, e.g., Permanent Injunction and Declaration]. 3. I state that the Defendant is attempting to [describe specific acts, e.g., demolish the boundary wall/transfer the title] of the suit property described in the Plaint. 4. I have a prima facie case in my favor as evidenced by [mention Title Deeds/Possession Documents]. 5. I believe that if the Defendant is not restrained by an ad-interim injunction, the subject matter of the suit will be destroyed, causing me irreparable loss that cannot be compensated by money. 6. The balance of convenience lies in favor of the Plaintiff, as the grant of stay will maintain the status quo, whereas refusal will lead to multi-fold litigation. 7. I have complied with the disclosure requirements of Order XI of the CPC and no material facts have been suppressed. DEPONENT VERIFICATION Verified at [Place] on this [Date] day of [Month], 2026, that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 7 are true to my personal knowledge and belief based on legal advice. No part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. DEPONENT

Expert FAQ

Can an injunction be granted against unknown persons?

Yes. In India, these are commonly referred to as “Ashok Kumar” or “John Doe” orders. They are vital in intellectual property and internet piracy cases to stop unidentified infringers.

Is a Statement of Truth mandatory for all suits?

It is mandatory for “Commercial Suits” as defined under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. For non-commercial suits, a standard verification under Order VI Rule 15 is sufficient.

What is the remedy against a wrongful ex-parte stay?

The Defendant can move an application under Order 39 Rule 4 for variation or discharge. Alternatively, an appeal can be filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r).

Can an injunction be granted to stop a bank guarantee?

Courts rarely stay bank guarantees. An injunction is only granted in cases of “established fraud” of which the bank has notice, or to prevent “irretrievable injustice.”

What is your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
0 %