Transfer of Filed Suit Affidavit: Preponement Application Format, Section 151 CPC & Court Fee Refund Procedure (India)
Litigation in Indian District Courts frequently involves long intervals between hearings. If parties settle a dispute privately during this waiting period, keeping the case alive serves no purpose and only increases legal costs.
To close the matter immediately, lawyers file a document colloquially known as the “Transfer of Filed Suit Affidavit.” Technically, this is a misnomer; the correct legal procedure is an “Application for Putting Up the Case File” (Preponement) under Section 151 of the CPC.
This guide corrects common filing errors, provides the exact formats to bypass registry objections, and details the specific prayer clause required to claim a 100% refund of court fees under the Supreme Court’s M.C. Subramaniam ruling.
Transfer of Filed Suit Affidavit: Format, Procedure, and Settlement Protocols
By Legal Research Team | India Jurisdiction
Litigation in India often involves long intervals between hearings. When parties settle a dispute privately during this waiting period, they face a procedural hurdle. They need to inform the court immediately to record the settlement and stop further legal costs. The document used for this is colloquially called the “Transfer of Filed Suit Affidavit.”
This name is a misnomer. Using the word “Transfer” can confuse the court registry, as it technically implies moving a case from one jurisdiction to another under Section 24 of the CPC. The correct legal terminology is an “Application for Putting Up the Case File” (or Preponement Application). This guide breaks down the correct format, the refund of court fees, and the step-by-step procedure.
The Procedural Mechanics
Understanding the movement of the physical file is essential for drafting the application correctly. In Indian District Courts, files are not kept in the courtroom permanently. They are stored in the Record Room or with the Ahlmad.
Figure 1: The Administrative Path of a “Putting Up” Application
The process involves four distinct stages:
- Filing: The application is submitted at the Filing Counter with a nominal court fee.
- Registry Check: The clerk verifies the case status in the Case Information System (CIS).
- Retrieval: The Ahlmad locates the file from the future date bundle.
- Listing: The file is placed before the Judge for “Orders” or “Miscellaneous Business.”
Correct Formats and Templates
We have reconstructed the formats to ensure they pass registry scrutiny. The generic “Transfer” format often found online lacks specific prayers regarding court fee refunds and the proper invocation of Section 151 CPC.
Interactive Template Generator
Select the type of template you need below to view the correct legal language.
Registry Objection Troubleshooter
Applications are frequently returned by the Registry for technical defects. This module identifies common objections and the immediate legal fixes.
The Courtroom Protocol: Recording Statements
Once the application is allowed and the file is on the Judge’s table, the “Transfer” or “Putting Up” is complete. However, the case is not closed until the Statements of Parties are recorded. This is the script typically followed in Indian Civil Courts.
Comparative Analysis: Settlement Modes
Choosing the right method to close a case impacts enforceability and costs. See the comparison below.
| Feature | Compromise Decree (Order 23 Rule 3) | Withdrawal (Order 23 Rule 1) | Lok Adalat Referral |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Binding Decree | Dismissal of Suit | Final Award |
| Enforceability | Immediately Executable | Not Executable | Deemed Decree |
| Court Fees | Refund varies by State | No Refund | 100% Refund |
| Appeal | Barred | N/A | Barred |
State-Specific Court Fee Refund Rules
While the Supreme Court’s M.C. Subramaniam judgment advocates for refunds even in private settlements, State Amendments to the Court Fees Act create variations. Consult this matrix before drafting your prayer clause.
| Jurisdiction | Applicable Provision | Refund Quantum | Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delhi | Sec 16, Court Fees Act | 100% Refund | Settlement must be recorded before issues are framed, though courts are liberal post-Subramaniam. |
| Maharashtra | Sec 43, Bombay Court Fees Act | 50% or 100% | 100% if settled before issues; 50% if evidence has commenced. Refund is discretionary at later stages. |
| Karnataka | Sec 66, KCFSV Act | 75% Refund | If settled before evidence recording begins. 50% if evidence is partially recorded. |
| Uttar Pradesh | State Amendment | No Statutory Provision | Refunds are difficult unless the matter is formally referred to Mediation Centre or Lok Adalat. |
The Corporate Settlement Protocol
When the “Transfer of Suit” involves a Private Limited or Public Limited company, a simple signature is insufficient. The application will be rejected without the following hierarchy of documents.
Mandatory Corporate Annexures
- Board Resolution: A certified true copy of the Board Resolution explicitly authorizing the signatory to “compromise, settle, and withdraw” the specific suit number.
- Authorized Representative (AR) Presence: The person named in the Resolution must be physically present in court to record the statement.
- Common Seal: While optional under new Company Law amendments, many older District Court manuals still insist on the company seal on the affidavit.
Navigating the “Hidden” Court Hierarchy
To ensure your application moves from the Filing Counter to the Judge’s desk on the same day, you must interact with specific court staff effectively.
Digital “Putting Up”: The E-Filing Procedure
With the digitization of Indian Courts (CIS 3.0), physical filing is often accompanied or replaced by e-filing. Here is the specific digital pathway.
- Portal Access: Log in to efiling.ecourts.gov.in.
- Select Application Category: Do not choose “New Case.” Select “Interlocutory Application” (IA) in existing case.
- IA Type: Choose “Preponement” or “Early Hearing” from the dropdown. If unavailable, choose “Others” and type “Application for Putting Up File”.
- PDF Specification: The application and affidavit must be scanned as a single OCR-searchable PDF (Max 5MB).
- Filing Number: Note the specific IA Filing Number, not just the acknowledgment number, to track the listing status.
The Timing Protocol: Pre-Lunch vs. Post-Lunch
Timing is everything when trying to get a file listed on the same day. Filing too late usually results in the file being listed for the next day, forcing parties to return.
The “File Not Found” Crisis Guide
A common hurdle in District Courts is the “Missing File.” If the Ahlmad reports the file is untraceable, follow this escalation matrix.
Often, files are sent to the Copying Agency (CA) because one party applied for a certified copy. Ask the Ahlmad to check the “CA Register.”
Sometimes files are kept in the Judge’s chamber for writing detailed judgments on interim applications.
Drafting the “Statement of Satisfaction”: The Final Shield
The application is just the vehicle; the destination is the recorded statement. To ensure the case cannot be reopened later (Res Judicata), your statement must contain specific keywords.
Mandatory Phrases for the Statement
National Lok Adalat Synchronization
If your settlement involves a complex fee refund issue or if the court is reluctant to refund fees under Section 16, use the National Lok Adalat route.
Instead of a standard “Putting Up” application, title your application:
“Application for Referral of Matter to Upcoming National Lok Adalat.”
Strategic Benefit: Awards passed in Lok Adalat are deemed decrees and are non-appealable. Furthermore, Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act guarantees a 100% refund of court fees, bypassing any restrictive state amendments.
Strategic Refunds: The M.C. Subramaniam Doctrine
Historically, refunds were only granted if the court referred the matter to a mediation center. However, in M.C. Subramaniam vs. High Court of Madras (2021), the Supreme Court ruled that even private out-of-court settlements are eligible for court fee refunds under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.








